Diablo on Mobile, but it's disappointed
Have you never heard about Diablo, a blizzard games that from 1997, and it's so popular that we got Diablo on mobile.
Diablo Immortal is a Hack n slash games that take place between Diablo 2 and 3. The game is really simple as Diablo 3 did, kill the enemies, fight the strongest enemies, rinse and repeat. It's really fun hack n slash top down top notch action, but feel to me is satisfied. The games has classes that from original, my favorite are necromancer because he was using soldiers to attack the enemies.
You play as want to classes you can, each classes are different attack range and mechanic. Necromancer was mage, Barbarian was axe, Sword, Demon hunter was archer, and monk was a fist.
The game map was from Diablo 2 and 3, and the realm of damnation was behind of responsibility to who attack the human and getting killed. The devil was Lazr was a antagonist this series. Diablo was actually a villains, but idk. And let's go to for the gameplay, the gameplay otherwise was MMORPG with Diablo slap on it. Your objective was find the mission.
The graphics are really like Diablo 3, but on mobile with controller support that can be feel better.
Now, i skip to this. I forgot to mention how greedy Blizzard was? Yeah, look, Blizzard is massive greedy and the company was care about money, not fans. It's simply the bad business practices. The worst part of this is elder rift, right. Elder rift is a dungeon multiplayer that can be up to 4 player, and that use a chest gem. In streaming of Asmongold, he pay over $1 million dollar to complete this. This is perfect example that Blizzard was greedy. The Metacritic are so bombing behind Warcraft Reforged was 0.6 in user score, but this is even lower, get 0.3 in user score because due to how poor of this microtransaction was.
Overall, the games is really great and for the best part, but outrageous overpriced microtransaction is can be final nail of the coffin for Diablo franchise.
Ratings: 6/10
Mentioned games
Comments
Latest
No more comments. Why not add one?
